Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Denis Kudla vs Ryan Peniston Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kudla vs Peniston analysis and find out who is favored!
Denis Kudla vs Ryan Peniston Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kudla 1 - 0 Peniston
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kudla has won 50.47% of points on their second serve, while Peniston has won 51.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kudla, in recent form, has won 53.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Peniston has won 52.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.13% and 26.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kudla has saved 60.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peniston has saved 42.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kudla has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 36/ 27), with Peniston winning 52.08% (W/L 25/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kudla has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 102/ 62), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 76/ 80). Peniston has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 151/ 81), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 54/ 46).
- Player level: In the last year, Kudla has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 27/ 18), where as Peniston has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.5% of matches (W/L 23/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kudla winning 1 times and Peniston being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kudla winning 2 and Peniston winning 0. The last match between Kudla and Peniston was at the Columbus Challenger, 23-09-2023, Semifinals, I.hard with Denis Kudla getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:16.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kudla and Peniston have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kudla winning 0 times and Peniston 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kudla winning 0, and Peniston 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kudla has played against opponents with an average rank of 277.76 while Peniston has played against players with an average rank of 238.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kudla has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peniston has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kudla has converted 40.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peniston has converted 32.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
161
Rank
53
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
215
Rank
123
High
28
Age
L
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
56% (497-389)
Career Total W/L
61% (287-187)
57% (16-12)
YTD W/L
30% (3-7)
$2,357,445
Career Prize Money
$221,850
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Denis Kudla | Ryan Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:16 | 1:23:16 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (26/53) | 58% (34/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (23/26) | 71% (24/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 70% (19/27) | 52% (13/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (22/59) | 21% (11/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Denis Kudla
Player
Ryan Peniston
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Denis Kudla | Ryan Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (16/12) | 30% (3/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (38/28) | 41% (9/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (320/296) | 46% (94/110) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.5 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 150 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 74 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:9 | 1:46:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237.18 | 224.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1130/1988) | 56% (340/604) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (787/1130) | 69% (236/340) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (433/858) | 52% (136/264) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (90/224) | 32% (18/56) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (809/1997) | 37% (256/696) |
| Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (9/6) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (16/28) | 33% (3/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (17/14) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (17/3) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (6/0) |
Denis Kudla Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Denis Kudla
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Vit Kopriva
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Jan Choinski
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
81%
(
13 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Denis Kudla
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Tristan Mccormick
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
8
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Denis Kudla
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Denis Kudla
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Denis Kudla
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Denis Kudla
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Bernard Tomic
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
48
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Ryan Peniston Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Ryan Peniston
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
104
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Buldorini
Player
Ryan Peniston
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
67%
(
12 of
18)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
10 of
20)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
51%
(
18 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
22
Total Points Won
31
|
2-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Ryan Peniston
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Ryan Peniston
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Gijs Brouwer
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Ryan Peniston
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Elias Ymer
52%
(
50 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
112)
3
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Ryan Peniston
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kudla Vs Peniston Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
